Discovery Scope and Proportionality Chain

validated legal chain v1.0.0 cc-by-sa

Block ID: 3b508742-aaab-4fef-b2f0-19a8495282aa

Community-contributed block. PromptDNA makes no guarantee of output quality or fitness for purpose. This block operates in a regulated domain. Nothing generated using this block constitutes professional medical, legal, or financial advice. User assumes all responsibility for use.

This block carries additional risk (risk level: medium) and requires a stronger domain-specific disclaimer when used.

Template

Analyze the proper scope of discovery for the request in {discovery_context}, balancing entitlement against burden. (1) Establish the relevance boundary: discovery reaches information relevant to a claim or defense, so tie each category sought to a specific issue in the case — a request untethered to a pleaded issue is a fishing expedition and objectionable. (2) Apply proportionality: weigh the request's importance against the burden and cost of producing it, considering the stakes, the parties' resources, and whether the information is available from an easier source — proportionality is now a limit on relevance, not an afterthought. (3) Screen for protections that remove material from discovery regardless of relevance: attorney-client privilege, work product, and other privileges, and plan the privilege log and any clawback protocol. (4) Address the electronic dimension: identify the data sources and custodians, the search methodology, the format of production, and preservation duties — because the duty to preserve attaches early and spoliation carries severe consequences. (5) For a party responding, distinguish valid objections (overbreadth, privilege, burden) from improper stonewalling, and produce what's plainly discoverable while objecting specifically to the rest. (6) State the defensible scope, the disputes likely to require a motion, and note that discovery rules and proportionality standards are jurisdiction-specific and require a licensed litigator's judgment.

Analyze the proper scope of discovery for the request in {discovery_context}, balancing entitlement against burden. (1) Establish the relevance boundary: discovery reaches information relevant to a claim or defense, so tie each category sought to a specific issue in the case — a request untethered to a pleaded issue is a fishing expedition and objectionable. (2) Apply proportionality: weigh the request's importance against the burden and cost of producing it, considering the stakes, the parties' resources, and whether the information is available from an easier source — proportionality is now a limit on relevance, not an afterthought. (3) Screen for protections that remove material from discovery regardless of relevance: attorney-client privilege, work product, and other privileges, and plan the privilege log and any clawback protocol. (4) Address the electronic dimension: identify the data sources and custodians, the search methodology, the format of production, and preservation duties — because the duty to preserve attaches early and spoliation carries severe consequences. (5) For a party responding, distinguish valid objections (overbreadth, privilege, burden) from improper stonewalling, and produce what's plainly discoverable while objecting specifically to the rest. (6) State the defensible scope, the disputes likely to require a motion, and note that discovery rules and proportionality standards are jurisdiction-specific and require a licensed litigator's judgment.

Variables

Name	Type	Required	Trust level
discovery_context		yes

discoverye-discoveryproportionalitychain-of-thought

Ratings

0.0

Overall (0)

0.0

Accuracy

0.0

Consistency

0.0

Clarity

0.0

Efficiency

Benchmarks

Not yet self-validated against any benchmark. Automated, evaluative only - not a factor in whether this block was published.

Submitted by James P FounderMod via mcp · 2026-07-18